First they came for the chocolate bunnies, and I did nothing because I am not a chocolate bunny.
Quite a weekend we’re having: Passover, Good Friday, Easter, the Masters and a few thousand Easter Egg hunts, to name a few.
Oh, and I smoked a pork roast that turned out totally incredible. But I digress:)
In the midst of all the holiday celebrations, worship, family time and so on, Amazon gets into the act. So much so that they are trending #1 on Twitter (you must be logged into Twitter in another browser window/tab BEFORE clicking this link, sorry but that’s just how Twitter search works).
The hashtag (ie: search term) on Twitter that is receiving all the attention is #amazonfail.
First they came for those with an Amazon rank
It’s been a while since the online bookseller stepped in it and alienated a huge number of people, but they got into the act again this weekend.
Last time it was about Amazon shafting authors who use print on demand services that weren’t owned by Amazon.
This time, it’s some or all of the “adult” community.
At first, it wasn’t clear exactly what was going on (and still may not be), but an official customer service response from Amazon indicates that they are removing sales rank data for content with adult ratings. Amazon now denies this, calling it a glitch.
A growing number of folks in the GLBT (or LGBT) community (particularly on Twitter) are noting some inconsistency of the removed ranking data, noting that it seems to apply more to content of interest to them than to adult material across the board.
No matter what your feelings about the various forms of sexuality, I should remind you about two things:
- First, the Rev. Martin Niemoller poem, “First they came“. If your business (through you) is willing to take on a group, be careful what you wish for. Be sure of your staying power with your stance on an issue.
- Second, while there are political and other sensitive issues here, this isn’t why I bring this up. There are business issues intertwined throughout this.
In Amazon’s case on this issue, they risk a nationwide boycott from the LGBT community. If they change their mind, they risk a boycott by other groups. If they waffle and end up somewhere in the middle, they might get both.
Yeah but this stuff has nothing to do with my business!
It’s 2009. For no cost, anyone can get detailed info about your political contribution numbers and plot them on a Google map and do any number of things with it, including to suggest that people pay you a visit.
Are you ready for that?
If you think your personal values don’t affect your business, think again.
Every business owner will inevitably find themselves taking a side on a political, theological or similar issue at some point (probably several dozen). You need to think through how you will handle situations like this.
- Will you bring your stance on contentious issues into your business?
- If you become active on an issue, will it impact your business and if so, are you strong enough to stand firm when the public attaches the issue to your business? It doesn’t matter what the issue is. What matters is how you will handle it and how your staff will handle it.
- Are you willing to deal with the fact that your staff feels differently about the issue (whatever it is) than you do? Whether you are or not, you should talk to a HR specialist or an attorney who specializes in employment law before hiring people. HR problems are a great way to lose your shorts.
- Is your stance on an issue going to affect the clients and employees you attract? As long as you are sure of yourself, that’s the primary concern. Well, that and are you acting within the law?
- Will your ethics on the issue in question suggest that your business ethics should be called into question?
I’m not asking nor suggesting that you temper your views or how and where you share them with others. Only you can make that decision.
Nor am I suggesting that you be hypocritical. Congruent for sure, but not hypocritical.
What I am suggesting is that you need to decide in advance if you are willing to lose your business (or a part of your business) over your stance on an issue. It’s ok either way,Â just be sure of yourself before you go down that road.
Some might suggest that you’ll get more business if you show your colors. In some cases, I think that’s absolutely right. One of the easiest examples I can think of where this likely helps a business is Ian’s stance on China, human rights and his Catholic goods store.
More than anything, I am suggesting that you consider the big picture before you step onto the soapbox.
No matter how you feel, it is difficult to get the genie back into the bottle.
PS: It’s all about the malted milk eggs for me.
UPDATE: An interesting theory on what might be happening to Amazon: http://tehdely.livejournal.com/88823.html
Whether this theory is true or not, it’s a valuable lesson for system designers of social media systems, interactive/community feedback systems and the like.
Meanwhile, a bunch of tweets reference people actively tagging conservative books with keywords that might get them de-listed from the sales rank numbers for the same reason that others are being de-listed.
UPDATE: Amazon says the change in sales rankings is a glitch. In social media circles, they arent getting a lot of traction on that. Time will tell.