Comments on: Ignore customers at your peril http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/2009/03/25/paying-attention-to-customers/ Strategic, common sense marketing, operations and tech advice that will strengthen your business - today! Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:16:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mark http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/2009/03/25/paying-attention-to-customers/comment-page-1/#comment-3749 Mark Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:09:13 +0000 http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/?p=1973#comment-3749 I suspect it was simply a "we havent gotten around to it" thing. The real message of the post is a bigger picture issue, of course:) Thanks for reading! I suspect it was simply a “we havent gotten around to it” thing. The real message of the post is a bigger picture issue, of course:) Thanks for reading!

]]> By: marianne http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/2009/03/25/paying-attention-to-customers/comment-page-1/#comment-3748 marianne Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:05:38 +0000 http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/?p=1973#comment-3748 I think this is an important message for every business owner to remember. What we may do to "help our customers" may cause more problems and confusion down the line... Asking customers what they need is always the first step. LISTENING to their answers and learning from them...even more important! Hope they listen to you Mark! I think this is an important message for every business owner to remember. What we may do to “help our customers” may cause more problems and confusion down the line…

Asking customers what they need is always the first step. LISTENING to their answers and learning from them…even more important!

Hope they listen to you Mark!

]]> By: Pilot liability insurance http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/2009/03/25/paying-attention-to-customers/comment-page-1/#comment-3746 Pilot liability insurance Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:53:36 +0000 http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/?p=1973#comment-3746 Hmm. I wonder if that was just a programming error or designed in that way for some obscure reason. Hmm. I wonder if that was just a programming error or designed in that way for some obscure reason.

]]>