<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When their eyes roll back in their head&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/2009/05/04/when-their-eyes-roll-back-in-their-head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/2009/05/04/when-their-eyes-roll-back-in-their-head/</link>
	<description>Strategic, common sense marketing, operations and tech advice that will strengthen your business - today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:16:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/2009/05/04/when-their-eyes-roll-back-in-their-head/comment-page-1/#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/?p=2130#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>From what Ive seen, even one of those small things can become a major thing - if its the wrong small thing. Thanks for sharing your standards document strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what Ive seen, even one of those small things can become a major thing &#8211; if its the wrong small thing. Thanks for sharing your standards document strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Eggen</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/2009/05/04/when-their-eyes-roll-back-in-their-head/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Eggen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemarketing.com/blog/?p=2130#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>Spot on!  I&#039;ve been making a standards document for not only me, but my other developers.  It will never be finished.

But one of the standards I placed in it for my developers is that technical terms are not visible in any program we make.  Instead of &quot;Record Will Be Added&quot; (which is also weak grammar), we replace such messages with &quot;Adding Customer&quot; or &quot;Adding Employee&quot; (stronger grammar as a bonus).  Why?  Does everyone know what a &quot;Record&quot; is?  If an image of pressed vinyl pops into your head, imagine your confusion trying to figure out how that applies to a computer.

Potential users of my programs are business people who are already nervous about technology.  &quot;If I press that button, the world will end and everyone will know its my fault!&quot;

So make a business program that speaks their lingo.  Computer programs must be inviting, not intimidating.  As an educator as well as programmer, I&#039;ve found only the glib like to toss out lingo in order to impress someone else.  And that even extends to their programs.

These are just some of the reasons I ban computer technical terms from the visible area of any business application.  Its a small thing really.  How many other small things are in a program that will add up to a &quot;it sucks&quot; major thing?

I find establishing standards like this saves a LOT of work down the road, not to mention support traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on!  I&#8217;ve been making a standards document for not only me, but my other developers.  It will never be finished.</p>
<p>But one of the standards I placed in it for my developers is that technical terms are not visible in any program we make.  Instead of &#8220;Record Will Be Added&#8221; (which is also weak grammar), we replace such messages with &#8220;Adding Customer&#8221; or &#8220;Adding Employee&#8221; (stronger grammar as a bonus).  Why?  Does everyone know what a &#8220;Record&#8221; is?  If an image of pressed vinyl pops into your head, imagine your confusion trying to figure out how that applies to a computer.</p>
<p>Potential users of my programs are business people who are already nervous about technology.  &#8220;If I press that button, the world will end and everyone will know its my fault!&#8221;</p>
<p>So make a business program that speaks their lingo.  Computer programs must be inviting, not intimidating.  As an educator as well as programmer, I&#8217;ve found only the glib like to toss out lingo in order to impress someone else.  And that even extends to their programs.</p>
<p>These are just some of the reasons I ban computer technical terms from the visible area of any business application.  Its a small thing really.  How many other small things are in a program that will add up to a &#8220;it sucks&#8221; major thing?</p>
<p>I find establishing standards like this saves a LOT of work down the road, not to mention support traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

